| (03) 9269 0120Melbourne | 1800 677 402Rural areas | Locate us |
Date : 05 Aug 2009
New laws give greater protection against discrimination under Commonwealth law. The definition of disability has also been broadened to include a person with a genetic predisposition of disease.
These changes follow recommendations from a report that looked into human rights in relation to disability discrimination and equal opportunity law in Australia.
It is now clear that it is unlawful to discriminate against someone because they have a carer, attendant or aid. This is considered discrimination because of a disability.
It also includes someone who is accompanied by an assistance animal. This could be a guide dog or other animal that has been trained to assist someone with a disability. The animal must meet behaviour and hygiene standards and it may be necessary to prove that the animal has received particular training to assist the person with a disability.
The law now makes it clear that there is a duty to make ‘reasonable adjustments’ to accommodate someone with a disability. This duty may include employers and organisations that provide accommodation, goods and services and education.
Changing a situation to avoid discriminating on the basis of someone’s disability will be expected, unless making this judgement would place an unjustifiable burden on the person or organisation.
The definition of discrimination has been broadened to make it clear that reasonable adjustments are expected to be made to avoid discrimination.
It may not be reasonable to make these adjustments to accommodate someone with a disability if this would cause unjustifiable hardship. This exception has been extended to all forms of unlawful discrimination except harassment and victimisation.
There is a new list of things that have to be considered when deciding whether unjustifiable hardship would result if adjustments were made to accommodate a person with a disability. They include:
It is up to the person who is trying to prove unjustified hardship to prove this.
It is an exception if the person with a disability would be unable to carry out the particular tasks of the job. Whether or not this exception applies will depend on an evaluation of:
It is unlawful to ask for information from someone with a disability that an employer would not ask a person who does not have a disability.
It is unlawful to discriminate against someone on the basis of their age. This includes both direct and indirect discrimination. Indirect discrimination is when the effect of a process is discriminatory. An example of indirect discrimination could be to put someone through a rigorous fitness test when generally older people may not be expected to compete with younger people.
The important change to age discrimination is that if there is more than one reason for making a decision and one of those is discriminatory, it does not need to shown to be the dominant reason for a decision is discriminatory. This means that if there are two or more reasons for making a decision and any one of the reasons is due to the age of a person or because of a characteristic, which relates generally to people of a particular age then this is discriminatory.
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission has become the Australian Human Rights Commission. This nominal change is updated in each Act where the old Commission was referred to.
Using disability discrimination
Disability Discrimination and Other Human Rights Legislation Amendment Act 2009 (new window)
Australian Human Rights Commission – Disability Rights (new window)